SJ20226JS

AI-Assisted Suicide and Self-Harm Risk Detection: Implications for Mental Health Nursing Practice — Scientific Journal
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL — Year 2026, Volume 4, Issue 2
Home  /  Archives  /  Volume 4, Issue 2  /  Article

AI-Assisted Suicide and Self-Harm Risk Detection: Implications for Mental Health Nursing Practice

Jeena Scaria1
1 Senior Lecturer, Mental Health Nursing Department
Al-Azhar College of Nursing, Thodupuzha, Kerala
Corresponding author: jeenascaria78@gmail.com
Published: 06 October 2026
Volume: 4   Issue: 2   Pages: 358–363
ISSN: 3107-4162

Abstract

Suicide and self-harm represent critical public health challenges requiring innovative early detection and intervention strategies. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning and natural language processing, have demonstrated promising potential for identifying individuals at elevated risk for suicidal behavior and self-injury. This narrative review synthesizes evidence regarding AI-assisted risk detection systems in mental health contexts, examining their clinical applications, empirical evidence, limitations, and implications for psychiatric and mental health nursing practice. Key findings indicate that machine learning models trained on electronic health record data, combined with natural language processing analysis of clinical narratives, can identify suicide risk with sensitivity ranging from 0.56 to 0.88 and specificity from 0.57 to 0.99, depending on model architecture and population characteristics. Hierarchical machine learning approaches integrating clinical history with repeated nursing assessments demonstrate superior performance for detecting self-harm risk in hospitalized psychiatric patients. However, successful clinical implementation requires addressing critical challenges including algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, clinical validation across diverse populations, and preservation of the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship. Mental health nurses are positioned as essential stakeholders in AI implementation, requiring education regarding AI capabilities and limitations, meaningful participation in system design and governance, and clear accountability frameworks. This review concludes that responsible AI integration in suicide and self-harm risk detection must prioritize ethical implementation, maintain human clinical judgment as primary, and ensure that technology augments rather than replaces nursing assessment and therapeutic intervention.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Machine learning Suicide risk Self-harm Mental health nursing Risk prediction Natural language processing Clinical decision support

Cite this article

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

The study was self-funded, and no external financial assistance was received.

Indexed in

Google Scholar OpenAIRE Zenodo DOI Registered

Related articles in this issue

SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL — scientificjournal.in@gmail.com
Scroll to Top